Menuju Distribusi Lahan yang Berkeadilan: Kebijakan dari Reforma Agraria di Empat Negara
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini membahas kebijakan reforma agraria di Brasil, Jepang, Zimbabwe, dan Indonesia untuk memahami pendekatan, hasil, dan tantangan dalam redistribusi lahan. Reforma agraria bertujuan mengatasi ketimpangan tanah dan meningkatkan kesejahteraan petani, tetapi pelaksanaannya dipengaruhi faktor sosial, ekonomi, dan politik. Brasil berupaya mengurangi ketimpangan melalui redistribusi lahan latifundia, namun terkendala resistensi pemilik tanah besar dan konflik sosial. Jepang berhasil menciptakan distribusi lahan adil pasca-Perang Dunia II dengan dukungan pemerintah, meningkatkan produktivitas pertanian. Di Zimbabwe, reforma agraria yang tergesa-gesa menyebabkan krisis ekonomi dan penurunan produktivitas. Indonesia menunjukkan kemajuan melalui program Perhutanan Sosial dan TORA, meski terhambat konflik lahan. Studi ini menyoroti pentingnya perencanaan matang, dukungan kebijakan, dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam reforma agraria untuk mencegah dampak negatif. Kesuksesan reforma agraria memerlukan pendekatan holistik, mencakup dukungan politik, kapasitas lokal, dan pengelolaan konflik.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adil, A T yang. “Beranjak Dari Krisis Menuju Perubahan,” 2022. https://www.tni.org/files/2023-09/JT_Primer_BAH_WEB.pdf.
Agusalim, Zico Junius Fernando, and Ganefi. “LAND , LAW , AND JUSTICE : INDONESIA ’ S CRUSADE AGAINST LAND” 1, no. 1 (2023): 50–65.
Christopher, Millen, Hamonangan Lumban, Fakultas Hukum Universitas, Putu Edgar Tanaya, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Udayana. “AGRARIA DI INDONESIA” 11, no. 11 (2023): 2724–36.
Kawagoe, Toshihiko. “Agricultural Land Reform in Postwar Japan: Experiences and Issues.” Policy Research Working Papers World Bank Wps 1, no. May (1999): 43. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=636209.
Kühner, Tobias, Carlos Vinícius Da Silva Pinto, and Cláudia Naves David Amorim. “International Urban Agendas and Sustainable Integrated Urban Development in Developing Countries: The Case of Brazil.” Cidades, no. April (2021): 120–38. https://doi.org/10.15847/CCT.20208.
Leisering, Lutz. One Hundred Years of Social Protection, 2020. http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/16294.
Lipton, Michael. “Land Reform in Developing Countries Property Rights and Property Wrongs,” n.d.
Moyo, Sam. Land Reform under Structural Adjustment in Zimbabwe: Land Use Change in the Mashonaland Provinces, 2000.
Narh, Petrus, Cosmas Kombat Lambini, Matius Sabbi, and Van Dien Pham. “Reformasi Sektor Pertanahan Di Ghana , Kenya Dan Vietnam : Analisis Komparatif Efektivitasnya,” 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/tanah5020008.
Ngarava, Saul. “Impact of the Fast Track Land Reform Programme (FTLRP) on Agricultural Production: A Tobacco Success Story in Zimbabwe?” Land Use Policy 99, no. February 2019 (2020): 105000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105000.
Nugroho, Aristiono. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Untuk Riset Agraria.” Gramasurya 1 (2020): 1–200.
O’Donnell, Rachel. “Land and Freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and Peasant Alternatives to Neoliberalism.” Land and Freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and Peasant Alternatives to Neoliberalism 3663 (2014): 1–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2014.1022030.
ÕCHI, TSUTOMU. “The Japanese Land Reform: Its Efficacy and Limitations.” The Developing Economies, 1966. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1966.tb00776.x.
Ohno, Kenichi. The History of Japanese Economic Development. The History of Japanese Economic Development, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315444048.
Salim, M. Nazir. REFORMA AGRARIA Kelembagaan Dan Praktik Kebijakan. STPN Press, 2020.
Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. “Popular Agrarian Reform and the Struggle for Land in Brazil.” Dossier 27, no. April (2020): 38.
https://thetricontinental.org/dossier27-land/.
Zikhali, Precious. “Environment for Development Fast Track Land Reform and Agricultural Productivity in Zimbabwe.” Policy, no. October (2008).