The Synergy of Knowledge, Experience, and Satisfaction in Engineering Education

Main Article Content

Muhammad Hafiz Kamarudin
Mohd. Suri Saringat
Siti Khalijah Shuib

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the knowledge mastery, experience, and satisfaction of engineering lecturers at University and Polytechnic in teaching engineering subjects. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 248 lecturers across the Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering departments through a questionnaire. Descriptive statistical analysis via SPSS was employed, analyzing mean scores, Pearson correlations, and regression results. The findings reveal that the lecturers possess a high level of knowledge (mean score = 3.97) in the engineering subjects they teach, particularly in the areas of application (mean score = 4.01) and understanding (mean score = 3.98). Approximately 70.3% of lecturers have adequate teaching experience, which they enhance through peer discussions. Satisfaction levels are also high, with a mean score of 4.12 for job satisfaction and 4.15 for responsibility. The analysis found a weak but positive correlation (0.205) between knowledge mastery and experience, although regression analysis indicated that experience only explained 4.5% of knowledge mastery. In contrast, a strong positive correlation (0.756) was found between knowledge mastery and job satisfaction, with satisfaction accounting for 57.1% of the variation in knowledge mastery. The results suggest that while experience has a limited impact on knowledge mastery, satisfaction plays a significant role, implying that lecturers with greater knowledge of their subjects are more likely to experience higher job satisfaction.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Aroff, A.R.M., & Kasa, Z. (2014). Philosophy and concept of education. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.

Busher, H., Harris, A., & Wise, C. (2020). Leadership in education and its impact on job satisfaction. ERIC database.

Cook, B., Semmel, M., & Gerber, M. (2015). Teacher preparedness in education.

Cramer, K. (2014). The vocational teacher pipeline: How academically well-prepared is the next generation of vocational teachers? U.S. Department of Education.

Goodwin, C. J., et al. (2023). Professional teacher education trends. Education Sciences.

IEEE Xplore. (2021). Rethinking engineering education: Policy, pedagogy, and assessment during crises.

Justi, R., & van Driel, J. (2016). Using the interconnected model to develop science teachers' knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(4), 437-450.

Kasalak, G., & Dağyar, M. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Education Sciences.

Nature Journal. (2023). Influence of teacher satisfaction on engineering education.

Rahim, A. (2015). Teaching professionalism: Prospects and challenges. Kuala Lumpur: Language and Library Council.S.

Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). The impact of leadership on teacher satisfaction. Journal of Educational Leadership Studies.

Shields, M. (2017). The role of leadership in improving teacher satisfaction. Journal of Educational Leadership.

Witterholt, M., Goedhart, M., Suhre, C., & van Streun, A. (2022). The interconnected model of teacher growth: Applications in professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 661-674.