Validity of Authentic Assessment Instruments on Discovery Learning Model of Static Fluid Materials for Senior High School Grade XI
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Addressing the challenges of the 21st century requires a strong emphasis on education. The core competencies referred to as the 4Cs—Communication, Collaboration, Critical Thinking, and Creativity—are central goals of the 2013 Curriculum, its revision, and the current prototype curriculum aimed at modernizing the learning process. To foster these competencies, effective assessment methods are essential. Assessments provide valuable insights to enhance both teaching and learning quality. The 2013 Curriculum particularly highlights the role of authentic assessment in evaluating student outcomes holistically. Motivated by this, the researchers developed an authentic assessment activity sheet integrated within a discovery learning model on static fluid topics for Grade XI high school students. The research adopts the ADDIE instructional design model, focusing on the development phase, specifically the validation process. The validation outcome, measured using Aiken’s V index, indicates a strong level of validity, with an average score of 0.88.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Afolabi, A. d. (2010). Analysis Of Science Process Skill in West African Senior Secondary School Certificate Practical Examination in Nigeria. Bulgarian Journal Of Science and Education Policy (BJSP) , 4 (1), 32-35.
Aiken, L. (1985). Content Validity and Reliability of single Items or Questionnaires. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGY MEASUREMENT .
Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
B.Uno, H. (2013). Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Cahyadi, R. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis ADDIE Model. Islamic Education Journal , Halaqa.
Chang, C. &. (2005). The Development of Authentic Assessments to Investigate Ninth Graders' Scientific Literacy: In the case of Scientific Cognition Concerning the concepts of Chemistry and Physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics .
Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Managemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Dr.Sunarti M.Pd, S. R. (2014). Penilaian dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: CV ANDI OFFSET.
Dr.Supardi. (2016). Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Afektif, Kognitif, dan Psikomotor (Konsep dan Aplikasi). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Festiyed. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Fisika. Padang: SUKABINA Press.
Festiyed. (2015). Paradigma Pembelajaran Fisika Dan Asesmen Autentik Untuk Mewujudkan Generasi Emas Yang Kolaboratif, Kooperatif, Kompetitif Dan Berkarakter. dalam Seminar Nasional dan Kuliah Umum Universitas Sriwijaya. Palembang.
Festiyed, D. (2016). Modul Mata Kuliah dan Pengembangan Evaluasi dan Asesmen Evaluasi Proses Pembelajaran Fisika. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.
Gatlin, L. &. (2002). Standards-based digital portfolio : A component of authentic assessment for preservice teachers. Action in Teacher Education , 4 (23), 28-34.
Hayat, B. (2004). Penilaian Kelas dalam Penerapan Standar Kompetensi. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur , 108-112.
Huba, M. &. (2000). Learner-centered assesment on college campuses: shifting the focus from teaching to learning. 160 Gould St. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Hufri. (Journal of Physics). 2020. Analysis of basic electronicd 2 textbook review form the aspects of creative thinking in the Physics Department of FMIPA UNP , conff.ser.1481 012124.
Jelita, A. R., Festiyed, & dwiridal, L. (2015). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning dengan Penilaian Autentik pada Materi Getaran,Gelombang, Bunyi dan Cahaya Terhadap Kompetensi IPA Peserta didi Kelas VII SMP Negeri 4 Kubung. Pillar of Physics Education , 1-8.
Johnson, D. &. (2010). Colaborative Learning. Strategi Pembelajaran untuk Sukses Bersama (Terjemahan Narulita Yusron). Bandung: Nusa Media.
Kemdikbud. (2013). Pedoman Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.
Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian Autentik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kunandar, D. (2015). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Leighbody, G. (1968). Methods of Teaching Shop and Technical Subjects. New York: Delmar Publishing.
McGregor, D. (2007). Developing Thinking Developing Learning. Poland: Open University Press.
Moore, M. (2005). Meeting the educational needs of young gifted reader in the regular classroom. gGifted Child Today , 4 (28), 40-47.
Mueller, J. (2007). Authentic Assessment Toolbox : What is Authentic Assessment ? from http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctri.edu/toolbox/whatisit.htm.
Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Muri, Y. (2013). Quantitative Methodology, Qualitative and Mixed Methodology. Padang: UNP Press.
Oh, D. K. (2005). Valid and reliable authentic assessment of culminating student performance in the biomedical sciences. Advances in Physiology Education , 2 (29), 83-93.
O'malley.J.M& Chamot, A. (1990). Learning Strategies In Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Permendikbud. (2013). Peraturan mentri pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.
Popovich, K. (2006). Designing and implementing 'exemplary content, curriculum, and assessment in art education.'. Art Education , 6 (59), 33-39.
Priansa, D. (2015). Manajemen Peserta Didik dan Model Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Prof.Dr.Hamzah B.Uno, M. (2012). Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Purwanto. (2009). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Pustaka Belajar.
Riduwan. (2012). Pengantar Statistik untuk Penelitian Pendidikan, Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rochmad, R. (2012). Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif , III (1), 59-72.
Rusman. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Kharisma Putra Utama.
Rusman. (2012). Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.
Salvia, J. (2004). Assessment in special and inclusive education (9 th). New York: Houghton Mifflin..
Sari, T. N. (2016). The Implementation of Model Discovery Learning and Assessmen Authentic to increase Student Science Skill Process in Biology Subject at Class X.1 of SMK Farmasi Ikasari Pekanbaru in Academic year 2015/2016. UNRI .
Siswanto. (2018). Modul Pelatihan Fisika. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D . Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suhardi, D. (2021). Penilaian Autentik Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMAN 1 Pagaden. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan .
Supardi. (2013). Penilaian Autentik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Swadarma, D. (2013). Penerapan Mind Mapping dalam Kurikulum Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment : Authenticity, context and validity. Phi Delta Kappan , 3 (75), 200-214.
Yusuf, M. (2015). Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Press.
Zulastri. (2017). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Sifat Bangun Datar Siswa Kelas III Mi. Universitas Negeri Walisongo Semarang , 21.