Pertanggungjawaban Terhadap Wanprestasi Pada Bank Garansi Terkait Peran Notaris (Kasus Putusan Nomor 214/Pdt.G/2016/PN Pbr)

Main Article Content

Anggun Isma
Tiara Purnama Jelita
Dwitri Nurul Arizti

Abstract

A bank guarantee is a financial facility provided by banks to clients to ensure the fulfillment of contractual obligations. This service is regulated by the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPer) Articles 1820-1850 and Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 23/88/KEP/DIR of 1991. Bank guarantees are typically used in construction projects to protect project owners from default risks by contractors. If a contractor fails to meet obligations, the bank assumes responsibility, provided that the contractor offers collateral equal to the guarantee's value. This paper analyzes the responsibilities of parties involved in default cases related to bank guarantees, focusing on Case No. 214/Pdt.G/2016/PN Pbr. The dispute was filed by PT. Mawatindo Road Construction against the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of Riau University concerning the construction of Building B of the University’s Teaching Hospital. The conflict arose when the contractor requested a project extension under Presidential Regulation No. 4 of 2015, but the request was denied, and the contract was unilaterally terminated by the defendant. The role of a notary in drafting bank guarantee deeds is crucial to ensuring legal certainty. According to Article 15 of Law No. 2 of 2014 on the Notary Position, a notary is responsible for creating authentic deeds that bind parties. However, a notary is not liable for defaults committed by the parties in the agreement. The notary’s responsibility is limited to ensuring the validity of documents and providing legal advice on contract clauses. In conclusion, bank guarantees function as a risk protection mechanism against defaults. However, the primary responsibility for fulfilling agreements lies with the parties involved, not the notary. Therefore, it is essential for all parties to adhere to legal provisions when drafting agreements to avoid future disputes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Isma, A., Purnama Jelita, T. ., & Nurul Arizti, D. . (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Terhadap Wanprestasi Pada Bank Garansi Terkait Peran Notaris (Kasus Putusan Nomor 214/Pdt.G/2016/PN Pbr) . Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research, 2(1b), 2612–2619. https://doi.org/10.32672/mister.v2i1b.2950
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Anggun Isma, Universitas Andalas

Program Studi Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Andalas,

 Kota Padang, Indonesia

Tiara Purnama Jelita, Universitas Andalas

Program Studi Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Andalas,

 Kota Padang, Indonesia

Dwitri Nurul Arizti, Universitas Andalas

Program Studi Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Andalas,

 Kota Padang, Indonesia

References

A’yun Amalia, Ifada Qurrata, dan Endang Prasetyawati. “Karakteristik Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Pembentukan Klausul Perjanjian Waralaba.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 2, no. 2 (2019): 173. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v2i2.2513.

Dariwu, Denish Davied. “Bank Garansi Sebagai Pengalihan Hak Kewajiban Apabila Nasabah Wanprestasi Oleh Nasabah Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Pasal 1831 & 1832.” Lex Crime V, no. 7 (2016): 7.

Dsalimunthe, Dermina. “Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Dalam Perspektif Kitab UndangUndang Hukum Perdata (BW).” Al-Maqasid 3, no. 1 (2017): 16.

Fadlillah, Rachma. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembiayaan Syariah Akibat Dibatalkanya Akad Musyarakah Pada Perbankan Syariah.” Makalah Ilmiah, no. January (2021): 1–23.

Kosasih, Ridwan Miftah, dan Aad Rusyad Nurdin. “Peran Notaris Dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama Antara Developer Dan Bank Untuk Penyaluran KPR.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) 7, no. 1 (2023): 365–77. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v7i1.4190.

Melati, Gladys Octavinadya. “Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Dalam Pendaftaran Fidusia Online Terhadap Penerima Fidusia.” Jurnal Repertorium, ISSN:2355-2646, Edisi 3 Januari-Juni 2015, 2015, 65. gladysoctavinadya@ymail.com.

Mirwansyah, Mirwansyah, dan Syahpri Kholik. “Kekuatan Hukum Legalisasi Notaris Terhadap Perjanjian Hutang Piutang Jika Terjadi Wanprestasi.” Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 2, no. 01 (2023): 8–17. https://doi.org/10.24967/jaeap.v2i01.2072.

Naja, Daeng. Hukum Kredit Dan Bank Garansi. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005. Sinaga, Niru Anita. Nurley Darwis. “Wanprestasi Dan Akibatnya Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 11, no. 1 (2019): 1–14.

Siswanto, Ade Hari. “Karakteristik Hukum Dan Pelaksanaan Bank Garansi Dalam Jaminan Kontrak Jasa Konstruksi.” Lex Jurnalica 14, no. 1 (2017): 24–35.

Sri Retno, Widyorini. “Bank Garansi Sebagai Jaminan Bagi Pihak Ketiga.” Serat Acitya 1, no. 1 (2020): 84–89.

Sugiyanto, Sugiyanto. “Pengaruh Pendapatan Garansi Bank Terhadap Laba Operasional.” Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi & Keuangan 7, no. 1 (2019): 11 https://doi.org/10.17509/jpak.v7i1.15800.

Tejawati, Desy Nurkristia. “Penyelesaian Perjanjian Bank Garansi Dalam Hukum Perbankan.” Perspektif 17, no. 2 (2012): 108. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v17i2.100.

Yosi Mandagi. “Pelaksanaan Bank Garansi Sebagai Suatu Jaminan Proyek Pada Pembiayaan Proyek Pemerintah Di Provinsi Riau.” Journal Equitable 5, no. 1 (2021): 68–88. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v5i1.2465.