Analisis Saksi Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Wanprestasi dan Kekuatan Pembuktiannya Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia

Article Sidebar

PDF (File Download)
Published: Dec 13, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32672/mister.v2i1b.2532
Keywords:
Evidence, Witnesses, Civil Procedure Law

Main Article Content

Anggun Tri Ramadhani
Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Evidence is a statement of rights or events in the trial that must be proven. Evidence in civil procedure law is regulated in HIR and Burgerlijk Wetboek or Civil Code book IV. Legal evidence recognized in civil procedure law is regulated in Article 164 HIR, Article 283 Rbg, and Article 1866 of the Civil Code which consists of written evidence, witnesses, testimony, confessions, and oaths. In proving with evidence in the form of witnesses, at least two witnesses must be supported. The role of witnesses in criminal cases is very important to uncover and expose crimes. From the investigation stage to the proof at trial, the role of witnesses is often a determining factor in the success of disclosing a case. Their testimony, which is considered as the main evidence of the five legal evidence according to Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, is very important in the legal process. In proving civil cases, letters are the most important evidence. This is different from criminal cases, where witnesses play the main role as evidence. However, currently in civil cases, the main focus should be the pursuit of material truth over formal truth.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tri Ramadhani , A. (2024). Analisis Saksi Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Wanprestasi dan Kekuatan Pembuktiannya Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia . Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research, 2(1b), 982–988. https://doi.org/10.32672/mister.v2i1b.2532
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1b (2025): NOVEMBER 2024 - JANUARI 2025 (TAMBAHAN)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Anggun Tri Ramadhani , Universitas Negeri Semarang

Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

References

Herziene Indonesich Reglement (HIR)

Barama, M. (2012). Satu Saksi Bukan Saksi dalam Perkara Pidana.

Dinaryanti, A. R. (2013). Tinjauan Yuridis Legalisasi Akta Di Bawah Tangan Oleh Notaris (Doctoral dissertation, Tadulako University)

Ginting, J. B. (2020). PROSES PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PERDATA. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris, 4(1), 12-21

Kaligis, R. Y. (2017). Penggunaan Alat Bukti Sumpah Pemutus (Decisoir) dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Menurut Teori dan Praktek. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 23(8).

Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia.

Panie, Y. R., & Marbun, L. (2023). Optimalisasi Alat Bukti Saksi Pada Persidangan Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri (Kasus Putusan Nomor 18/Pdt. GS/2021/PN. Mrt). Yure Humano, 7(2), 87-96.

Rahmah, M., & Bachri, S. (2022). Keabsahan Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Pada Perkara Penetapan Ahli Waris Menurut Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Hukum Islam. Sakina: Journal of Family Studies, 6(2)

Sari, N. D. K., & Syafrudin Yudowibowo, S. H. (2016). Kekuatan Pembuktian Persangkaan Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Pada Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Verstek, 4(3).

Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.

Suandi, S., & Laela, F. I. (2024). Proses Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Melalui Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Menurut Undang-Undang 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. KRAKATAU (Indonesian of Multidisciplinary Journals), 2(2), 182-198.

Tiodor, P. C., & Tjahyani, M. (2023). Pembuktian Wanprestasi Perjanjian Utang Piutang Secara Lisan. Krisna Law: Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana, 5(1), 27-39