Analisis Tahapan Pemeriksaan Pembuktian dalam Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1666 K/PDT/2022
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to analyze in depth the stages of evidentiary examination in civil procedural law in Indonesia. Evidence is a crucial element in the civil justice process, because its success greatly influences the judge's decision. This research uses normative juridical methods with a statutory and regulatory approach, as well as analysis of legal doctrine and court practice. This article describes in detail each stage of evidence, starting from submitting evidence, evaluating the evidence by the judge, to the final decision. The results of the analysis show that the implementation of the evidentiary stages in Indonesia still faces challenges, especially related to the consistent application of legal principles by judges. This research provides recommendations to clarify procedures and strengthen judicial integrity in evidentiary examinations in civil cases
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Subekti. (2004). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata (HIR/RBg).
Abdul Manan. (2016). Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. M. Yahya Harahap. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Subekti. (2004). Pokok Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Iwan Setiawan. (2017). Praktik Pembuktian dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Denny Indrayana. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Candra Rudi. (2020). "Aspek-Aspek Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Perdata". Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(2), 235-250.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor K/Pdt/2022 perihal Memeriksa Kembali perkara perdata pada tingkat kasasi Budi berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tanggal 13 Oktober 2021.