Peer Review Process

Peer Reviewe Policy
Research articles submitted to this online journal will be peer reviewed at least 1 to 2 (one to two) reviewers. Accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer review process. The language used in this journal is English or Indonesian. Peer reviews are designed to assess the validity, quality and often authenticity of articles for publication. Its main purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles. From a publisher's point of view, peer reviews serve as a content filter, directing better quality articles to better quality journals thereby creating the journal brand. Running articles through a peer review process adds value to them. For this reason publishers need to ensure that peer reviews are effective.
Editor's Feedback
"Addressing the specifics of the deficiencies in the structure of the paper is paramount. Is the method valid, are the data clearly presented, and are conclusions supported by the data? (Editor's feedback)
If the editor can read your comments and clearly understands the basis of your recommendations, then you have written a useful review. (Editor's feedback)

Best Peer Reviews
In general, to be acceptable, a manuscript should represent an advance in understanding likely to influence thinking in the field. There should be a discernible reason why the work deserves the visibility of publication in a Jurnal Serambi Ilmu (SI) rather than the best of the specialist journals. The reviewers will then submit their reports on the manuscripts along with their recommendation of one of the following actions to the Editor:
1. Accept Submission;
2. Revisions Required;
3. Resubmit for Review;
4. Resubmit Elsewhere;
5. Decline Submission;
6. See comments.

ARTICLE PROCESSING AND SUBMISSION CHARGES
In accordance with its mission to disseminate educational knowledge Serambi Ilmu (SI) does not take fees for processing and submission of articles